CURRENTa practice of living in motion
You are in CURRENT

Engagements

Five ways to enter the work.

Sometimes a question needs arguing in public. Sometimes leaders need an unhurried room for their own experience. Sometimes a team is carrying a live dilemma, or needs to leave the familiar room altogether. And sometimes the organisation itself needs observing.

Five engagements — different in depth and setting, grounded in the same practice of Stay · Sense · Shape.

The principle

We do not assume an intervention is needed.

CURRENT begins with attention.

Some situations need action. Some need a different conversation. Some need experimentation. And some need the restraint not to act yet.

The engagement takes its shape from the condition — not the other way around.

At a glance

Choose by situation, not sequence.

The order describes depth of attention. Each engagement can be entered directly.

  1. IEncounterLeadership Panel DebateA contested question60 – 90 min
  2. IIDialogueLeadership ConversationsLived leadership experience90 – 120 min
  3. IIIApplicationExecutive DialogueA live leadership situationHalf – full day
  4. IVImmersionLeadership ExpeditionLeadership behaviour in changing conditions2 – 4 days
  5. VOrganisational sensingOrganizational Orientation DynamicsThe organisationMulti-week

The portfolio

Five doors into the same body of thinking.

Each engagement can be read in brief below, or opened in full.

I

Encounter

CURRENT Leadership Panel Debate™

A contested question. Different voices. In public.

When an important leadership question deserves to be argued from more than one position.

You may recognise this

  • A leadership question is being discussed as if one interpretation were obviously correct.
  • Different interests or professions read the same challenge differently.
  • An audience would gain more from genuine disagreement than from polished consensus.

The invitation

A facilitated debate on a contested leadership question, held in a public, semi-public or conference setting. CURRENT provides the frame, not the conclusion. Competing perspectives are deliberately welcomed, and the audience is drawn in where that sharpens the argument.

Duration
Typically 60 – 90 minutes
Audience
Usually 3 – 5 voices plus facilitator, before an audience
Setting
Public, semi-public or conference setting

II

Dialogue

CURRENT Leadership Conversations™

Your experience. Other perspectives. In dialogue.

When leaders want to explore their own experience together — without needing to arrive at the same answer.

You may recognise this

  • Leaders want to make sense of experiences they recognise but rarely have time to examine together.
  • The group wants conversation rather than presentation.
  • People need a room where nobody has to defend a position immediately.

The invitation

An intimate, highly participative conversation about leadership and organisational life, in which participants’ own experience becomes the material. Interpretations may differ; the purpose is closer noticing rather than agreement.

Duration
Typically 90 – 120 minutes
Audience
Approximately 8 – 30 participants
Setting
A smaller, more intimate room — leadership community, reading group or evening dialogue

III

Application

CURRENT Executive Dialogue™

Think together before deciding together.

When a leadership team is carrying a real situation that keeps returning.

You may recognise this

  • The team is aligned on paper but not in practice.
  • The same difficult issue keeps returning.
  • Pressure to act is overtaking the quality of judgement.

The invitation

A confidential executive working session centred on a real organisational condition — not a generic case, and not a leadership programme. The team brings the situation. CURRENT provides a disciplined way of staying with it long enough to see it more clearly.

Duration
Half day, full day, executive retreat or dialogue series
Audience
Typically 4 – 16 participants
Setting
Confidential · indoor leadership-room setting

IV

Immersion

CURRENT Leadership Expedition™

Leadership becomes visible when the conditions change.

When behaviour under uncertainty is discussed far more often than it is observed.

You may recognise this

  • The leadership team knows each other mainly through meetings and roles.
  • Behaviour under uncertainty is discussed more often than observed.
  • The team wants to understand how leadership emerges outside formal hierarchy.

The invitation

An immersive offsite engagement in which leadership is explored under conditions of movement, dependence and uncertainty. The terrain is not merely scenery — changing conditions become part of what the team encounters.

Duration
Typically 2 – 4 days
Audience
Designed around one leadership team
Setting
Outdoor, offsite or mixed environment

V

Organisational sensing

CURRENT Organizational Orientation Dynamics™

Flagship organisational engagement

See how the organisation is actually orienting itself.

When the formal strategy is clear, but the organisation is moving by other signals.

You may recognise this

  • The formal strategy is clear, but behaviour is moving elsewhere.
  • Different parts of the organisation appear to follow different signals.
  • The organisation needs to understand itself before another initiative is launched.

The invitation

An organisational sensing engagement, sponsored at leadership level. It explores the people, signals, relationships and patterns around which an organisation is actually organising itself. The purpose is not a culture score; it is to make orientation visible.

Typically multi-week · Leadership-sponsored · Scope shaped around the organisational question

Duration
Typically multi-week · leadership-sponsored
Audience
Leaders and staff across levels, functions and groups
Setting
Interviews, observation and dialogue, with early readings tested across the organisation

Through the CURRENT lens

The same practice. Different depths.

Each engagement is grounded in Stay · Sense · Shape, but the emphasis changes with the situation.

A debate sharpens how a contested question is sensed. A confidential dialogue asks a leadership team to stay with the situation before shaping anything. An Expedition lets all three be observed under live conditions, and Organizational Orientation Dynamics carries them across a whole organisation — shaping only when there is enough understanding to act deliberately.

Movement in the current — the practice, in motion.

Before you write

What people ask before they begin.

Which engagement is right for us?

↓

It follows from the situation. A contested question argued in public is met by a Panel Debate; leaders wanting to examine their own experience together by Leadership Conversations; a live executive dilemma by an Executive Dialogue; behaviour under changing conditions by a Leadership Expedition; and an organisation orienting itself in unclear ways by Organizational Orientation Dynamics. If it is not obvious, describe the situation and we will say which one fits — including when none of them does yet.

Do we need to know CURRENT beforehand?

↓

No. Every engagement begins with the situation as participants already experience it. The vocabulary of the practice is introduced only where it makes something easier to see, and reading the book or the Companion beforehand is welcome but never assumed.

How tailored is the format?

↓

The frame is consistent; the content is not. Each engagement is designed around the condition the organisation brings, so duration, participants, setting and emphasis are agreed in advance. Where scope genuinely varies — particularly for Organizational Orientation Dynamics — it is agreed at the outset rather than promised in advance.

What about confidentiality?

↓

Closed engagements are confidential. What is said in an Executive Dialogue, an Expedition or an organisational sensing process is not reported outward, attributed to individuals, or reused as case material without explicit agreement. Confidentiality and organisational ethics are agreed before the work begins.

What happens first?

↓

A conversation, normally 30 to 45 minutes, about the situation rather than the format. If an engagement is the right response, we propose a shape. If it is not, we say so — sometimes the most useful outcome of the first conversation is that no intervention is needed yet.

Groundwork

Read the theory, then test your own practice.

Adaptive Leadership

What adaptive leadership is, and how it connects to Stay · Sense · Shape.

Open →

Leadership Assessment

A nine-question reading of your three movements, with a personal action plan.

Open →

Complexity Leadership

Stacey's work and the theoretical ground beneath the practice.

Open →

Alongside the practice

Saxskiold — people, search & advisory.

The engagements above sit inside a wider practice. Where an engagement surfaces a gap in the leadership itself, Saxskiold carries the work forward: executive search, leadership assessment, succession and board advisory across the Nordic region.

Explore SAXSKIOLD engagements →

Inquiries

Describe the situation, not the format.

Begin a conversation →